Category: Articles

  • God Owes Us Nothing

    God Owes Us Nothing

    Anansi ndi nkhondo.
    “Relatives are a battle.”  

    We have all experienced this, in many different ways.  If you have followed the Lord’s leading into ministry, you probably attracted some family rebukes.  Relatives called you foolish.  They muttered that you were wasting your abilities.  

    Relatives are a battle in that they also fight for our time and attention.  When a father seeks to work, sometimes he is drawn away by conflict in the family. When a mother needs a moment of rest, the children plot trouble and chaos.  Anansi ndi nkhondo!  

    But who in Africa would actually suggest that we should avoid family, marriage, and children?  These three are intertwined in African culture, and even more so, we expected these blessings from God as a reward for our faithful service to Him.  Yet our eyes turn to the words of God in Jeremiah 18.  

    NO FAMILY for Jeremiah

    The word of the Lord came to me: “You shall not take a wife, nor shall you have sons or daughters in this place. For thus says the Lord concerning the sons and daughters who are born in this place, and concerning the mothers who bore them and the fathers who fathered them in this land: They shall die of deadly diseases. They shall not be lamented, nor shall they be buried. They shall be as dung on the surface of the ground. They shall perish by the sword and by famine, and their dead bodies shall be food for the birds of the air and for the beasts of the earth.

    Jeremiah (16:1-4)

    Jeremiah was commanded by God to not have a family. He had no wife to support him and no children to bless him.  But when we serve God, sometimes we must break culture.  

    Consider the consequences are having no children. What happens if you lack a child, an heir?  When you die, your family land will pass to another, won’t it?  But why would Jeremiah need an heir, if the land was to be destroyed?  The children would not inherit; they would die. 

    Jeremiah lived in a time with God’s judgment looming over rebellious Judah (see the remainder of Jeremiah 16).  In a sense, Jeremiah’s life was a picture of Judah’s future – wifeless, childless, destitute.  He was a visible sign to the nation of what was to come.

    NO EVENTS for Jeremiah

    For thus says the Lord: Do not enter the house of mourning, or go to lament or grieve for them, for I have taken away my peace from this people, my steadfast love and mercy, declares the Lord. Both great and small shall die in this land. They shall not be buried, and no one shall lament for them or cut himself or make himself bald for them. No one shall break bread for the mourner, to comfort him for the dead, nor shall anyone give him the cup of consolation to drink for his father or his mother. You shall not go into the house of feasting to sit with them, to eat and drink.For thus says the Lordof hosts, the God of Israel: Behold, I will silence in this place, before your eyes and in your days, the voice of mirth and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride.

    Jeremiah 16:5-9

    Many of us have a family member who acts like they are not in the family.  
    Someone is dead, but they do not come. 
    Grief has visited the family, but they will not grieve.  
    Even when there is joy such as with a birth or a wedding, they never arrive.  

    It is as if they left the family, ignored society, and disgraced the African way of life.  

    Jeremiah’s situation was not so different.  He would be considered an outcast to avoid funerals and feasts.  While others participated in the customs of the day, he was only permitted to care about God and delivering His Word.  From another viewpoint, the calling of God can look like a curse.  

    The life of Jeremiah was on display before the people.  Since judgment was coming, he could not participate in life as usual.  God had withdrawn His pity from Israel, so how could Jeremiah shed tears at a funeral when God was not grieved?  

    Recognizing that God instructed Jeremiah to live in a particular way before judgment, how should we live at this time – the time appointed to us?  

    1. Acknowledge that singleness for God’s service is honorable.  

    Jeremiah was commanded to be single and celibate. In some cultures, we treat that like a death sentence.  But brothers and sisters, the time before final judgment is short for us today. The Lord may return now!  Let us hear the words of 1 Corinthians 7:25-31. 

    I think that in view of the present distress it is good for a person to remain as he is. Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be free. Are you free from a wife? Do not seek a wife. But if you do marry, you have not sinned, and if a betrothed womanmarries, she has not sinned. Yet those who marry will have worldly troubles, and I would spare you that. This is what I mean, brothers: the appointed time has grown very short. From now on, let those who have wives live as though they had none,and those who mourn as though they were not mourning, and those who rejoice as though they were not rejoicing, and those who buy as though they had no goods,and those who deal with the world as though they had no dealings with it. For the present form of this world is passing away.

    1 Corinthians 7:25-31

    The parallels to Jeremiah are shocking.  The impending judgment of Judah was close, and so Jeremiah was told to avoid family attachments and the normal events/rhythms of life.  Paul uses the same reasoning to Christians in Corinth.  Judgment is soon.  The present world is passing away – taking its last breath.  

    If you are unmarried, can you accept those words? It is no sin to marry, but with the little time remaining and the ministry laid before you by God, do have you time for those joys and those troubles?  Some like Peter did, but others like Paul and Jesus did not.  

    2. Choose the obligations and responsibilities that will empower your calling, not inhibit it.  

    For Jeremiah to fulfill His responsibilities and represent God’s message well, God determined that Jeremiah would be single and culturally inappropriate.

    What had God called each of us to in these last days before judgment?  The time is short.
    Can we carry our calling and be a prominent member of society? 
    A politician?  A husband and a father?  A wife and a mother?  

    We must choose our obligations wisely, and let them not encroach on our calling.  Can we only choose responsibilities that will cooperate with and assist our heavenly King’s orders?  

    We cannot simply get married or do anything because it is the normal thing to do in our culture or family.  We are in the service of the Almighty God. 

    3. God is not obligated to bless you with family, events, or public honor.  

    What if God called you to be a servant without family or social involvement outside of ministry?  
    Could you bear it?  
    How much would you complain?  
    How much would your family complain?

    Brothers and sisters in Christ, listen carefully. Contrary to the many words of blessing you have received and the many promises of a prosperous tomorrow declared over you, God does not owe you anything.
    You are not owed a spouse.
    You are not owed children.
    You are not owed a comfortable church position.
    You are not owed a place of honor in your family.
    You are not owed social standing. 

    Our cultures and families teach us what is normal and what we are entitled to.
    They train us to expect honor when we are old, and families when we are young. 
    They teach us the social norms we must follow. 

    Yet when we have a higher King – the King of Kings – we find that we are not owed anything in this world.  Don’t forget the words of Christ in Luke 9:59-60,“To another he said, ‘Follow me.’ But he said, ‘Lord, let me first go and bury my father.’”  That’s perfectly reasonable, but when we follow the King, Jesus can say, “Leave the dead to bury their own dead. But as for you, go and proclaim the kingdom of God.”

    God called Jeremiah, and Jeremiah lived like God owed him nothing.  He “enjoyed” a forty-year ministry where virtually no one listened to him.  But he served God well, even as he missed the joys of family and the events of life.  He had success in his ministry.

    And in our time, God calls us.  God owes us nothing in this world; we owe Him everything.  


    Dr. Scott MacDonald serves as the Academic Dean and a lecturer with the Baptist Theological Seminary of Zambia.  He enjoys exploring issues pertaining to Biblical Demonology, African Christian Theology, and Byang Kato.  He is married to Michal, and they have three children – Malachi, Adelaide, and Isaiah.  Visit his website at https://scottdmacdonald.academia.edu/.

  • Recognizing Neo-Pentecostal Influence in Your Sermon Preparation

    Recognizing Neo-Pentecostal Influence in Your Sermon Preparation

    One of the most challenging things for all of us called to teach and preach God’s Word is to learn to silence our biases and cultural expectations sufficiently to see what the Word actually says rather than what we expect it or want it to say [1]. In a Christian culture so fundamentally shaped by Neo-Pentecostalism, this can be particularly challenging. If we are to move toward a more biblically-grounded homiletic, it is important to first recognize some of the common hermeneutical and homiletical traits of the charismatic/pentecostalized traditions. Below are 3 of the most common.

    1. Authority is located in the person, not the text

    One of the ways Neo-Pentecostalism (NP) may show up in your sermon preparation is in your presentation of theological truth to the listeners. In discussing this major difference in NP vs. evangelical hermeneutic, Randy Arnett summarizes the differences thus:

    “Neo-Pentecostals routinely declare, ‘Apostle Joshua says…’ Evangelicals routinely say, ‘The Bible says…’ Neo-Pentecostals trust a person. Evangelicals trust a text… The hermeneutic extracts the Scripture passage from its context where the Spirit-Power person interprets the passage according to his ‘insight’ into the unseen world…Sermons routinely concentrate on the experiences or revelations of Spirit-Power persons, including those of the preacher himself or herself.” [2]

    Arnett is not suggesting that evangelicals do not place their faith in Jesus, or the apostles, or the prophets of the text of Scripture. Rather, in answering the question, “By whose authority have you preached these things?” Neo-Pentecostals answer with the pastor’s name, while evangelicals answer with a Scripture reference.

    Arnett and others rightly acknowledge that this comes out of deeply-rooted worldview and conceptual frame of reference. A person from an oral culture whose conceptual frame of reference is concrete-relational rather than abstract will naturally and persistently show preference to locating authority in a human being rather than a text. This is true of pastors just as much as congregations. Arnett [3] is insightful here again:

    “This misplaced trust undergirds, sustains, and bolsters pentecostalization. The believer needs a solidly biblical epistemology that relies on the final authority of Scripture…He can be sure that what he knows is justified because it is written in Scripture, not because a Spirit-Power person claims it. Until this fundamental foundation changes from a person to the Bible, Neo-Pentecostals will continue to be vulnerable to the whims of false teachers.

    If you find yourself commonly discussing your spiritual experiences as examples of your insight or as the foundations of your authority, you need to recognize this as the influence of Neo-Pentecostalism.

    2. The immediate is given preference over the historical

    In studying a text for sermon preparation, what are the first questions you begin to ask? What are the first avenues down which your thoughts go? Do you begin by sensing and tracing out the connection of your text to you congregation? Or do you begin by asking what the author intended to communicate? Upkong [4] suggests that for many church communities in Africa, “the main focus of interpretation is on the communities that receive the text rather than on those that produced it or on the text itself, as is the case in western methods.”

    Upkong, Gallegos, and others [5] suggest that the contextual hermeneutic approach is one marked by a concern to link the biblical text with the reader’s context, as if that is a point of departure from a historical-critical hermeneutic. However, this is only true if we fail to differentiate hermeneutics and homiletics. The historical-critical method is not unconcerned with linking the biblical text to a modern context, but rather is concerned hermeneutically to grasp the original meaning of the biblical text, and homiletically to constrain our teaching such that we do not deviate from the text’s original meaning. The contextual hermeneutic differs not in that it seeks to connect the Bible to present hearers, but that it telescopes the pursuit of meaning and the application of that meaning. In other words, the contextual approach is less concerned with what the original audience of the text would have heard, and is content to read a text without effort to subdue modern contextual biases and frames of reference. Allen Anderson [6]:

    “Put another way, Carlos Mesters (1993:14) says that when the ‘common people’ (such as AIC members) read the Bible a ‘dislocation’ occurs and ‘emphasis is not placed on the text’s meaning in itself but rather on the meaning the text has for the people reading it’ (emphasis mine).”

    If you do not constrain your preaching by authorial intent, but prioritize an anachronistic reading which does not seek to understand the original meaning of the text, you are likely working from a Neo-Pentecostal hermeneutic.

    3. The search for blessings and power.

    Gifford [7] suggests that the emerging African Christianity desires above all to find how God’s covenant promises and blessings are connected to the present, and therefore: “The major biblical motifs in this emerging Christianity are thus those stressing victory, success, hope, achievement. The texts that are dominant are therefore prophetic texts, and narratives of those who can be made to illustrate success.” Arnett [8] notes that the pursuit of spiritual power (or economic power, or social power) is the most common theme of Neo-Pentecostal sermons.

                If we are to seek the root of this tendency, we must recognize the influence of African traditional religion and the culture of animism. I would suggest that for many, if not most, Africans, (1) every circumstance and situation has an underlying spiritual cause, and therefore (2) the primary need in any circumstance is to gain spiritual power in order to increase well-being or avoid spiritual attack. Likewise, NP has a consistent focus on the pursuit of words of faith or power or blessing. The animistic milieu is soil ready-tilled for the NP emphases. That being said, every culture to which the Bible has come has tendencies to interpret through their own cultural lens, rather than learning to set aside their own cultural biases and hear what the Bible has to say on its own terms.

                If you find that one of your primary focuses in preparing sermons is to find promises of spiritual/economic/social power, you are likely laboring under the heavy influence of Neo-Pentecostalism. 


    [1] Gallegos, John. “African Pentecostal Hermeneutics” in Pentecostal Theology in Africa, p. 43. “First and foremost, the everyday reader reads from a specific socio-cultural context and conceptual frame of reference, which determine the interpretive agendas and emphases.”

    [2] Arnett, Randy. Pentecostalization: The Evolution of Baptists in Africa, pp.157-158

    [3] Ibid. 163

    [4] Upkong, Justin S. “Developments in Biblical Interpretation in Africa: Historical and Hermeneutical Directions” in The Bible in Africa: Transactions, Trajectories, Trends, p. 11.

    [5] Ibid. p. 25. Also see Gallegos, p. 43.

    [6] Anderson, Allen. “The Hermeneutical Processes of Pentecostal Type African Initiated Churches in South Africa”, Missionalia 24:2, Aug 1996, page 2

    [7] Gifford, Paul. “The Bible in Africa: a Novel Usage in Africa’s New Churches”, Bulletin of SOAS, 71: 2 (2008), 203–219.

    [8] Arnett, Randy. Pentecostalization: The Evolution of Baptists in Africa, p.76


    Daniel Lowry serves as a professor at Kenya Baptist Theological College outside Nairobi, Kenya, where his focus has been teaching Old Testament courses. Prior to this Daniel served as Pastor of New Castle First Baptist Church in Kentucky for 8 years. He holds a BA in Sociology from Louisiana College, and a Master of Divinity with an emphasis on biblical languages and theological studies from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Daniel and his wife, Kristen, have been married for 4 years and have 2 children: Serafina and Ebenezer.

  • 5 Things to Consider Regarding the Biblical Practice of Prayer

    5 Things to Consider Regarding the Biblical Practice of Prayer

    by Daniel Lowry

    What would happen if we examined our practice of prayer in light of the Scriptures? In his book, Pentecostalization: The Evolution of Baptists in Africa, Randy Arnett shares an anecdote about a pastor who did just that. The pastor said:

    “I studied prayer in the Bible. I set myself to study it. What did I do? I took simply the great men of prayer in the Bible—Abraham, Moses, Elijah. When I studied all that, I saw their common traits. Not one of them [prayed] as we do in our churches today. I came to other examples, for example, the Lord Jesus.”

    (p.160)

    Arnett goes on to explain that this pastor and his church changed the way they prayed based on their examination of how godly persons of the Bible prayed. So, to evaluate our practice of prayer, consider these 5 things: 3 “Dont’s” and 2 “Do’s”.

    1. Don’t pray like a hypocrite

    The 1st half of Matthew 6 deals with 2 kinds of people: those who do religious things to be seen doing them, and those who truly interact with God; hypocrites, and those who are genuine. One of the examples Jesus gives of the hypocrite is those who “…love to pray standing in synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men.” (Mt. 6:5) Perhaps you have attended church services in which each voice tries to be heard over the others during a group prayer time. Or perhaps you yourself have, at times, chosen your words in prayer more to impress those listening than to actually communicate with God. This is unacceptable in the Lord’s church.

    2. Don’t pray like a pagan

    In the same discourse, Jesus also says, “…do not babble on like pagans, for they think that by their many words they will be heard.” (Mt. 6:7) We can see this principle in 1 Kings 18:16-40 in the story of Elijah and the prophets of Baal atop Mount Carmel. In it we see 2 very distinct methods of prayer. In the first, a group of people gathers together and prays fervently, loudly, lifting up their voices together for hours. They claim the power of blood and do all they can to move the heart of the one to whom they pray. The second approach consists of a single prayer 2sentences long. It simply makes a request and leaves it at that. Which one did God honor? It was the second! The first was the prayer of pagan priests. Endlessly repeating (or shouting) our requests because we think our prayers will thus be heard is not Christian. It is a pagan practice. It is the prophets of Baal on Mount Carmel. It is many of our Baptist Churches.

    3. Don’t imitate the sons of Sceva

    I find it very common in churches that prayers are full of phrases like “blood of Jesus” or “name of Jesus” as though saying those phrases is powerful in and of itself. This seems similar to the sons of Sceva in Acts 19, who decided to imitate Paul and claim the name of Jesus in their own attempts to cast out demons. Their attempt ended poorly. (The demon-possessed man beat them all naked and chased them away bleeding.) What happened? They claimed the name of Jesus and His power against the demon! This account demands that we never use the name of Jesus or phrases like “the blood of Jesus” as power charms. When Jesus instructs us to pray in His name, he does not mean “insert my name in your prayers as a key to unlock my power.” To pray in the name of Jesus is to pray with faith in Him. It is to pray in the conscious awareness that I come to the throne not by my own authority or right, but by the authority of Jesus—not in my own name, but in the name of Christ.

    We could look at numerous examples of God-honoring prayer throughout the Scripture, but let’s stick with the examples we’ve already introduced: Elijah and Jesus. Both men exhibit the practical outworking of avoiding the Dont’s above.

    4. Pray like Elijah at Mount Carmel

    At Mount Carmel, Elijah prayed a very simple prayer. He didn’t repeat his requests over and over. He simply presented his request to God, acknowledging his desire for the Lord Himself to receive glory, and then waited for the Lord to answer. To many, this prayer would seem weak compared to the “powerful,, “passionate” prayers of the prophets of Baal. The lesson is this: we cannot and must not seek to impress God by our many words or the way in which we speak them.

    5. Pray like Jesus

    Jesus neither prayed to be seen, nor did he heap up repeated phrases and “powerful” words. He spoke to the Father and stated his requests with faith and a concern for the Father’s glory. In John 11, Jesus prays “Father, I thank You that You have heard Me. I knew that You always hear Me, but I say this for the benefit of the people standing here, so they may believe that You sent Me.” Jesus believed that any time he prayed, God heard him. He knew that he didn’t need to shout or repeat phrases over and over or claim power in some way. He knew the Father listened.

    We cannot hope to see the Lord’s power in response to our prayers if we pray like hypocrites and pagans. We will receive nothing from our grasping at power if we think power comes by our phrases and prayer formulations. But if we, in both belief and practice, follow the biblical example of prayer, then we can be certain that the Lord hears us and will act according to his will.


    Daniel Lowry serves as a professor at Kenya Baptist Theological College outside Nairobi, Kenya, where his focus has been teaching Old Testament courses. Prior to this Daniel served as Pastor of New Castle First Baptist Church in Kentucky for 8 years. He holds a BA in Sociology from Louisiana College, and a Master of Divinity with an emphasis on biblical languages and theological studies from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Daniel and his wife, Kristen, have been married for 4 years and have 2 children: Serafina and Ebenezer.

  • Prosperitizing Christianity- An Intro to an International Theological Crisis

    Prosperitizing Christianity- An Intro to an International Theological Crisis

    A “new gospel” is sweeping global Christianity. Jones and Woodbridge sounded the alarm a decade ago:

    A new gospel is being taught today. This new gospel is perplexing—it omits Jesus and neglects the cross. Instead of promising Christ, this gospel promises health and wealth, and offers such advice as: declare to yourself that everything that you touch will prosper, for in the words of a leading prosperity gospel preacher, ‘There is a miracle in your mouth.’ According to this new gospel, if believers repeat positive confessions, focus their thoughts, and generate enough faith, God will release blessings upon their lives. This new gospel claims that God desires and even promises that believers will live a healthy and financially prosperous life.1

    This new gospel is spreading rapidly and broadly beyond charismatic circles in American Christianity. Today, the prosperity gospel is being embraced even by evangelicals, especially internationally.2

    In 2006 the Pew Forum found 46 percent of self-proclaimed Christians in the United States and about 90 percent in Kenyans believed that God will grant material riches and economic success if one should have enough faith. We can see the evidence all around us in this facade of a gospelized culture, as key words and phrases are plastered everywhere—on matatus, buses, signboards, names of businesses: “blessed,” “by faith,” “God’s provision,” etc.

    How did we get here? What do we do to counter these peddlers of the prosperity gospel? We begin by identifying its philosophical and theological basis. There are at least three significant factors that have shaped this lens of prosperity—pseudo-Christian therapeutic psychology, animism, and bad hermeneutics.

    Prosperity Gospel as Pseudo-Christian Therapeutic Psychology

    In her book, Blessed: A History of the American Prosperity Gospel, Kate Bowler proposed a convincing argument that the prosperity gospel shares the same intellectual and theological roots as Christian Science and what would later be known as the New Age Movement. She wrote, 

    New Thought represents a cluster of thinkers and metaphysical ideas that emerged in the 1880s as the era’s most powerful vehicle of mind-power. [New Thought]…assumed essential unity between God and humanity, declaring that separation from the divine was only a matter of degree….As many New Thought authors worked inside a Christian framework, they explored “salvation” not as an act imposed from above by God, but rather an act of drawing out humanity’s potential.

    [In addition,] New Thought argued that people shared in God’s power to create by means of thought. People shaped their own worlds by their thinking, just as God had created the world using thought. Positive thoughts yielded positive circumstances, and negative thoughts yielded negative situations. 

    In its infancy, New Thought was largely preoccupied with healing…[offering] a religious alternative to the often harsh regimen of standard medical treatments. Bloodletting, mercury-laced purgatives, and arsenic tonics formed common “cures,” making orthodox medicine a potentially risky treatment. Early healers and systematizers of New Thought sought to explain illness as an imbalance resulting from wrong thinking.

    These gospels of health stood on one side of a blurry line between Christian metaphysics and metaphysical Christianity. One prioritized the method of mind-power, while the other concentrated on its relationship to Jesus’ death and resurrection.3

    Considering Bowler’s assessment, Thomas Kidd astutely noted, “As with so many types of aberrant theology, the prosperity gospel is dangerous precisely because it takes biblical themes to non-biblical extremes. It is not hard to demonstrate biblically that God wants an “abundant life” for his followers. But when that abundance gets defined in worldly terms, through the lenses of pseudo-Christian therapeutic psychology, we have the makings of a theological disaster.”4

    Prosperity Gospel as Syncretized Animism

    In the West, the rise and prominence of the prosperity gospel can be attributed to various philosophical and theological movements of modernity and the Enlightenment. But here in our African context, this counterfeit gospel is merely a syncretized form of animism. Per the animistic worldview, spiritual forces are behind every cause and effect in the universe and can be manipulated through the right channel. In this system, the shaman becomes the “voice” of the worldview, instructing fearful and/or hopeful pursuers of blessings or curses on what to do to bring about their desired end. Clearly this is the lens through which Joel Osteen wrote,

    When you say of the Lord you are healthy, you are whole, you are free, you are blessed, you are prosperous—when you say it, God has promised He will do it. …If you are not sharing in His favor, you might want to watch your words. Here’s the key: If you don’t unleash your words in the right direction, if you don’t call in favor, you will not experience those blessings. Nothing happens unless we speak. Release your faith with your words.5

    The role of shaman is a fitting one to describe prosperity preachers. Kenneth Copeland asserts that words have supernatural power—power that changes circumstances and shapes destinies. In his estimation it is our unique ability to choose and speak words that distinguishes man from the rest of God’s creation. He claims that man is created in God’s image and it was not just thoughts but words that God used to create us and the universe in which we live. When God said, “Let there be light,” light was. Therefore, words are the way God works. According to Copeland, because words are seen as spiritual; they carry power. Therefore, Copeland (and others like Joyce Meyer) have actually proclaimed that just as God looked into the void of nothingness and willed by his words, “Let there be light,” we as mini gods, can look into the nothingness of our circumstances and declare by faith and it will be.

    Is it any wonder that P.U.S.H.—“Pray Until Something Happens”—is the view of prayer held by so many across our region? Unfortunately, much of the praying that we see practiced around us is syncretized animism. People acting as though they have sovereignty over God or that in them rests the power to manipulate the circumstances of their lives or the spiritual forces at work around them. Without knowledge many people pray repeating the name Jehovah one hundred times in a given prayer or claiming things in the name of Jesus, but not in the biblical sense of praying. No, this kind of praying assumes that we have authority to PUSH God to act on our demands or requests rather than to rest in his absolute authority, wisdom, and pleasure.

    Prosperity Gospel as the Result of Bad Hermeneutics

    A third factor in the advancement of the prosperity gospel is bad hermeneutics. Simply put, prosperity preachers hold a pervasive, overarching hermeneutic that creates the filter through which eisegesis occurs in their interpretation of most Scriptures. Their approach to Scripture is accommodation—inserting their biases into texts, allegorizing Old Testament stories, failing to consider the historical and literary context of verses, ignoring the grammatical rules and semantics as employed by the author and understood by his original audience, and dishonoring the authors’ original, Holy Spirit-inspired meaning they intended to convey—to make the text fit their theology. Therefore, any passage of Scripture may be twisted to fit the prejudices held by the one who assumes that God’s mission is to help humanity to reach its greatest potential in the abundance of life. In other words, the prosperity gospel teaches “true Christian faith results in material wealth and physical well-being.” The pursuit of “abundant life” as defined by the reader becomes the modus operandi.

    There have been countless sermons on facing the giants in one’s life and overcoming them, or about going into and conquer God’s promise land—the land of overflow. But prosperity preachers will almost always gravitate to “blessings,” whether the passage includes the actual word or not. “Bless” is probably the greatest example of a word that has been hijacked of its meaning. The Old Testament uses two primary Hebrew words that are translated as “bless” — barak and esher. The former means to bow the knee as a sign of communicating one’s pleasure in another. The latter means to be happy or pleased with someone or something. Yet, in almost every use of “bless” by prosperity preachers, the implication is to receive material wealth.

    Perhaps the most familiar passage for prosperity sermons is Jeremiah 29:11—”For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.” Again, these messages are typically not based on consideration of the historical, grammatical, or theological contexts.

    Conclusion

    As Christianity continues to shift to the global south, the gospel witness will be propagated from this continent. But what gospel will be proclaimed? To be certain, Paul clearly noted that there is in actuality no other gospel; rather, the church is troubled by those who “want to distort the gospel of Christ.” He emphatically warned that “…even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed.”6

    Time and again the authors of the New Testament point out the presence and dangers of false teachers. As Jude urged the church in his day, let us “…contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints.”7


    1David W. Jones and Russell S. Woodbridge, Health, Wealth & Happiness: Has the Prosperity Gospel Overshadowed the Gospel of Christ? (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 2011), 14-15.

    Ibid., 16.

    Kate Bowler, Blessed: A History of the American Prosperity Gospel, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), 13.

    4Thomas Kidd, “The New Thought Roots of the Prosperity Gospel”, The Gospel Coalition, August 28, 2018, accessed from https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/evangelical-history/new-thought-roots-prosperity-gospel/.

    Joel Olsteen, It’s Your Time: Activate Your Faith, Achieve Your Dreams, and Increase in God’s Favor (New York: Free Press, 2009), 121-123.

    Galatians 1:6-10

    7 Jude 1:3

  • The Prosperity Gospel Among Neo-Pentecostals in Africa

    The Prosperity Gospel Among Neo-Pentecostals in Africa

    By Matthews A. Ojo


    Definition of Prosperity Gospel

    Since the 1980s, the Prosperity Gospel has become one of the major doctrinal emphases of contemporary Christianity in Africa. Borrowed from the American faith movement and Pentecostal televangelists, it became a popular concept by the mid-1980s, and was termed Prosperity Gospel by the media and scholars of religion.  The newness of this emphasis stems from the fact that biblical metaphors of success and material prosperity have taken on new meanings within the competitive modern market economy in Africa. Besides, this emphasis shows how Pentecostalism has responded to popular demand of Christianity for economic relevance in the African society.

    Simply put, Prosperity Gospel is a re-reading and interpretation of certain verses in the Bible in which God and the atoning death of Jesus Christ were understood to have promised a state of well-being, of abundance, of victory over social stagnation, abundance of money and materials to meet the needs of Christians so that they can live a life of spiritual and material abundance in the world.  

    Lacking any exegetical or contextual interpretation, and using proof text reading of the Scriptures as a method, Pentecostals and Neo-Pentecostals have taken certain passages as supportive of the doctrinal emphasis on prosperity.  The most quoted biblical passage is III John 2 ‘Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as the soul prospereth’ (KJV).  Similarly, other popular verses include Psalms 35:27, ‘Let them shout for joy and be glad … Let the Lord be magnified, which hath pleasure in the prosperity of his servant.’; Deuteronomy 8: 18, ‘But thou shall remember the Lord thy God: for it is he that giveth thee power to get wealth …’ Other verses include Deuteronomy 7:14; 8: 6-9; 28: 1-14; Joshua 1:7-8; II Corinthians 8:9, II Corinthians 9:6-8, Genesis 12:2; Zechariah 1:17 and Haggai 2: 6 – 8. 

    Prosperity preachers also insist that Christians enter into the realm of prosperity based on individual understanding of the God’s promises because God has given humans access to the Abrahamic covenant. Hence, one’s salvation launches one into the realm of God’s abundance, i.e. material benefits is the result of exercising faith.  However, Christians who are not prospering could be harbouring unbelief or are unaware of God’s promises and the laws of success or are not paying their tithes, or have accepted the lies of the Devil or are bogged down by sin and curses.

    As the emphasis gained attention in the mid-1980s so also emerged many publications mostly from Pentecostal pastors who initially promoted this emphasis. Generally, most of these Pastors started from the premise that salvation ushers in for the believer spiritual well-being; i.e. knowing and accepting Christ as one’s personal saviour. Thereafter in the exercise one’s faith, one could get the material benefits which include good health, wealth (money, houses, vehicles, etc.), and the ability to meet one’s needs as they come. 

    The doctrinal emphasis on prosperity has continued to elicit public interest because it has partly been associated with the growth of Pentecostalism in Africa since the mid-1980s. For instance, Paul Gifford in a major contribution has argued that the doctrine was an American export to Africa and represents a foreign religious commodity.[1]Birgit Meyer has revealed how the hidden obsession with wealth and power have provided powerful stimulus for Ghanaians Pentecostals in defining the Devil amidst the capitalist world economy.[2]Recently, Gifford has noted that the emphasis on success and wealth as this-worldly concerns among Ghanaian Pentecostals that partly built on traditional religious imaginations, and also ties into modern capitalist economy.[3]In another approach, Kwabena Asamoah-Gyadu and Kingsley Larbi have argued that Ghanaian Pentecostals and Charismatics coming from the Akan worldview tries to interpret the prosperity gospel as flowing from the concept of salvation.[4]  Other opinions abound on this debate.

    Doctrinal Emphasis of Prosperity Explained

    Some prosperity preachers insist that the emphasis flows from the concept of salvation, while others argue that prosperity is part of the blessings available to believers as part of God’s covenant with Abraham.  According to the Pentecostal preachers who lay great emphasis on prosperity, failure, poverty, unhappiness, and all forms of difficulties are considered as curses which should not be associated with Christians.  Rather, Christians should be successful and prosperous. ‘Prosperity’, according to David Oyedepo, ‘is a state of well-being in your spirit and body.  It is the ability to use God’s power to meet every need of men . . . In prosperity you enjoy a life of plenty and fulfilment. Prosperity is a state of being successful; it is life on a big scale’.  Oyedepo further stated that Christians do not enter into the realm of wealth and plenty as a result of prayer or fasting because it is not a promise but a covenant. Christians enter into the realm of prosperity based on understanding because God has given humans access to the covenant.[5]  Accordingly, Christians can get rich if they tap into the power of God.  ‘God has from the beginning created … you to prosper. God has capsules in the Bible, the unfailing laws of success’. ‘God is not partial. He wants everybody to prosper’. Therefore, ‘you must understand that you have the sole responsibility for your prosperity and good success.’ However, there is a limit to the capacity of humans to get wealth, because the unsaved i.e. non-believer could get prosperous materially, and some through unrighteous means.[6]

    The second aspect that is more emphasized in the contemporary era is material prosperity or financial prosperity, defined as having enough resources, which can be money, houses, cars, children, promotion, jobs, etc. Financial prosperity, though has its source in God, yet is the work of one’s hand. Some leaders pointed out that the vehicle through which God prospered the Old Testament men such as Abraham, Job, Solomon, etc. were the works of their hands. Thus, a responsibility is placed upon every Christian to engage his or her hands in worthwhile things.

    The first condition to accessing prosperity is to have knowledge of the word of God, obeying and serving God, being righteous and living in holiness, and not allowing riches have control over one. A Pentecostal pastor writes that the good and godly motive of being prosperous is for the propagation of the Gospel.  It is a false Christianity that equates poverty with piety, and at the same time it is bad to be devoted to materialism. The worship of materialism is mammon and a ‘rich fool’ is a person who is possessed by material wealth. 

    Generally, success and prosperity are perceived among Pentecostals as forms of healing when the Christian overcomes failure, poverty and backwardness, and live a life of sufficiency and abundance. To be prosperous, one is expected to give liberally and sacrificially towards the course of the Gospel, or ‘plant seed-money’ or sow ‘seed of faith’, as some neo-Pentecostals say. Some preachers emphasized that the more one gives to God’s work; the more abundantly the person receives in return. In fact, this aspect of the teaching has attracted much criticism from evangelicals. 

    Evangelicals have questioned the orthodoxy of the teaching that ignores Jesus’ teaching on the poor; a misinterpretation of the scope of the atonement; the false impression that giving automatically translates to prosperity; overlooking exegesis and interpreting Scriptural texts to support prosperity without their contexts, the idolisation of money and material wealth, overlooking suffering as a spiritual virtue, and the immoderate lifestyle of, and corruption among some prosperity preachers.[7]

    There are different refinements about the teaching on prosperity among neo-Pentecostal preachers, but generally the following listing represents the consensus within the constituency:

    1. God promises prosperity in the Scriptures and it is available to every Christian who accepts the scriptural truth. 
    2. Because prosperity is integral to the covenant with Abraham – ‘to bless and make him great’, Christians also stand as inheritors of that covenant. Hence, the popular chorus, ‘Abraham blessing are mine, I am blessed in the morning, I am blessed in the evening, Abraham’s blessings are mine’. 
    3. Material wealth and financial prosperity are necessary benefits of true spirituality which Christians must enjoy. Therefore, there is God’s approval when Christians are blessed materially.
    4. Understanding and acting by faith on the word of God is the path to prosperity. 
    5. Those who contribute generously in tithes, offerings, donations, etc. to the Church or God’s works ultimately receive abundant blessings from God because the quantity and quality of harvest is a function of the quantity of ‘seed’ sowed.
    6. If a Christian consistently lacks or is poor or has no material wealth to his benefit this could be considered an illness that needs healing.
    7. Christians who are undergoing suffering or sickness are out of the will of God. Unbelief and not tapping into the abundance of God’s resources is a sin. 
    8. Speaking positively, i.e. ‘name it and claim it,’ can lead Christians to higher grounds of prosperity.
    9. Christians should be strategic and business-minded in the Gospel ministry, so that they can make profit while serving the people.[8]

    Most preachers of prosperity often provide the principles or keys to utilise in entering the covenant of prosperity. Among these keys are dreaming big and expanding one’s horizon, believing, obedience to God’s command, sowing seeds or giving bountifully and sacrificially, partaking in ‘miracle meal’ i.e. the Eucharist, giving positive confession, exercising faith unconditionally, using anointing oil, claiming the power in the blood of Jesus, etc. In the David Oyedepo’s Living Faith Church, members regularly partake of the Eucharist, which is interpreted as shutting the doors against afflictions and failures and guaranteeing victory and success. Overall, this emphasis among neo-Pentecostals promotes the notion that one must not live below the optimum level but one must strive to add value to the resources that God has made available to humans, and continually endeavour to improve economically and socially.

    Historical Development of Prosperity Gospel

    As the Charismatic Renewal was undergoing denominationalisation in the 1980s into stable religious organizations with bureaucratic structures, the movement adopted great emphases on healing, which comprises of four major areas.  First is physical healing which is basic to all Pentecostal groups.  Second, there is healing constructed specifically with the African worldview of evil, witchcraft, and the world of spirits.  Within this realm, Pentecostals obtain healing when malevolent forces are cast out.  This process is termed ‘Deliverance’. Thirdly, the progressive nature of Pentecostalism is reflected in what is termed Success and Prosperity, which is healing over the socio-economic difficulties of the individual, and hence the believer can appropriate the blessings of Christianity.  Lastly, Pentecostals extended their healing activities over the political and socio-economic conditions of a nation.  This process is termed ‘Prayer for the Nations’’. However, prosperity has gained much grounds from the mid-1980s, and had become a distinct doctrinal emphasis. 

    Winning or fruitfulness are constant themes in sermons of churches stressing prosperity to a particular class of Christians.  Really, the neo-Pentecostal churches are urban in nature and have appealed to the educated middle class. Secondly, the churches’ entrepreneurial organization, sophisticated marketing techniques, and modernizing tendencies have facilitated the seemingly success of this emphasis on prosperity.

    Although subsequent development of the prosperity gospel was broader in scope, it was Archbishop Benson A. Idahosa (1939-1998), a Nigerian, who first propagated this doctrinal emphasis on a large scale among African Pentecostals in his continent-wide evangelistic programmes beginning from the late 1970s.[9]Writing in 1987, he noted that,

    God created men and women for a better life than many are experiencing…God never intended that anyone should go through life imprisoned by their own superstitions. He opens the door of success to every believer who will dare to step out and go after the good life. No one in God’s family was ever destined to exist in sickness, fear, ignorance, poverty, loneliness or mediocrity. God’s abundant goodness will be enjoyed and utilised by those who discipline themselves, become decisive, bold, adventurous, believing, daring, risking and determined.[10]

    By the time he died in March 1998, many other burgeoning African Pentecostal evangelists have accepted the teaching and had broadcast it wide through their radio broadcasts, television programmes, open air evangelistic meetings, tracts, Bible study outlines, booklets and audio tapes.  More important, testimonies or personal stories of individual successes which are spectacular are publicly advertised to strengthen the validity of their doctrinal emphasis on prosperity.

    The greatest apostle of Prosperity Gospel is David Oyedepo, the founder of Living Faith Church (popularly known as Winners’ Chapel) who was ordained by Idahosa in 1987. In 1995, he embarked on an expansion strategy from Nigeria into other African countries, and by 1997, branches have been established in thirty other African countries.  Oyedepo teaches that Christians are destined to experience abundance and material wealth in the world, therefore, they should aspire to be prosperous, and they should be known for their prosperity in the society, like riding good cars and wearing costly dresses.

    In practical terms, messages on this emphasis have been motivational, very assuring, and depict instances of triumphalism.  Indeed the founders often proved the efficacy of the messages with flamboyant and expensive lifestyle. Some do travel to the West for medical check-up, and some have bought private jets. There are also structures and educational investments like privately-owned universities to advertise this. Members often give testimonies of what they termed ‘supernatural financial breakthrough’.  Spiritual retreats have moved from the old evangelical camp meetings in the countryside to success seminars in downtown five star hotels.  Generally, there are corporate images of success to project this emphasis, and to launch members on the quest for upward material and social mobility.

    The Political and Socio-Economic Contexts of Prosperity Gospel

    What sustains this new doctrinal emphasis and the apparent quest for material wealth among neo-Pentecostals could be traced partly to the socio-economic and political upheaval in the African continent and the contemporary deteriorating economic situation in the 1980s and 1990s. The predatory nature of governance in Africa, the widespread corruption of the elite, the imposed-World Bank Structural Adjustment Programme with its austerity measures, the growing incidence of poverty in the continent despite several interventionist programmes, seem to have driven the masses to untold suffering. By the mid-1980s, a section of Pentecostal churches in Nigeria has legitimatised their existence by promoting the cause of the economic hardship to the forces of Satan as they wreaked havoc in the lives of individuals and in the African nations in general. Hence, the promise of miraculous wealth, perceived as healing, made the prosperity Gospel very popular among the lower and middle classes who have experienced economic destitution, and who saw opportunity for compensation to their economic travails, through the rhetoric of prosperity preachers.

     Besides, the attraction of ‘corrupt’ wealth has partly given currency to the emphasis on prosperity which has afforded neo-Pentecostals a means of responding to the economic conditions and the social values around them. While Pentecostals may argue that there is consonance in their emphasis with biblical prescriptions of wealth and well-being, the dissonance is manifested in the neo-Pentecostals’ pursuit and vending of prosperity as though economics and social structures of the society do not matter. The miraculous wealth without any commensurate productive activities also finds some congruence in the magic wealth that has become the dominant theme in the contemporary African home video films. 

    In Africa wealth is a means to recognition in the society and the means towards political power.  People have used various means to acquire wealth.  Hence, the emphasis on prosperity legitimizes the quest for materialism and the associated power and prestige that has characterized the values of African society since the 1980s. Neo-Pentecostals, through their doctrinal emphasis on prosperity as a new spirituality, have helped to lend new meanings to the quest for materialism, which traditionally has been subject of condemnation in old time evangelical Christianity. 

    Lastly, the social capital that neo-Pentecostal emphasis on prosperity has generated in terms of the drive and motivation to invest and succeed, to eliminate poverty by hard work, to create economic networks that can facilitate entrepreneurship, the promotion of frugality and economic risk-taking, are reflective of Max Weber’s Protestant ethic.  However, no stimulation for large scale economic development or enduring religious values have yet emerged to justify the economic implication of the Prosperity Gospel on the larger society.[11]

    Conclusion

    The continuing popularity of the Prosperity Gospel among neo-Pentecostals and African Christians, as already pointed out, arose from the fact that biblical metaphors have assumed new meanings in rapidly changing socio-economic situations. The failure of the economic and political systems to give better life to the citizenry have stirred up images of evil. Thus, poverty and backwardness are considered illness to which prosperity, as a healing factor, has been employed to rectify. Consequently, the emphasis on prosperity has become a powerful metaphor in negotiating wider socio-economic concerns, which they consider important within their socio-cultural background and the dislocation of contemporary life in a capitalist economy.


    [1]Paul Gifford,‘Prosperity: A New and Foreign Element in African Christianity’,Religion,(1990)20:4,373-388.

    [2]Meyer, Birgit. Translating the Devil:Religion and Modernity among the Ewe in Ghana(Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 1999), pp. 237-8.

    [3]Gifford, Paul. Ghana’s New Christianity: Pentecostalism in a Globalizing African Economy. (London: C. Hurst & Co., 2004).

    [4]J. Kwabena Asamaoh-Gyadu, African Charismatics: Current Developments Within Independent Indigenous Pentecostalism in Ghana(Leiden: Brill, 2005), 201-232. See also E. Kingsley Larbi, ‘The Nature of Continuity and Discontinuity of Ghanaian Pentecostal Concept of Salvation in African Cosmology’, Asian Journal of Pentecostal Studies5. No. 1 (2002): 99-119.

    [5]Weekly Faith Digest, published by Living Faith Church, No 89/20, p. 3. See also David O. Oyedepo, Signs and Wonders Today: A Catalogue of the Amazing Acts of God Among Men(Ota: Dominion Publishing House, 2006), pp. 165-169.  See also David Oyedepo, Making Maximum Impact(Ota: Dominion Publishing House, 2000), pp. 71-72.

    [6]Hartford Anayo Iloputaife, Dynamics of Biblical Prosperity(London, Victory Publications Inc. of Faith Revival Ministries World Outreach, 1995), pp. 9-11and15-17.

    [7]The media has reported on some of the moral scandals involving prosperity preachers in Africa and in the Western world.  It is invidious to mention names and we lack the space to discuss any of them here.

    [8]For details of David Oyedepo’s capitalist strategy, see Oladimeji Olutimehin, Business Secrets of David Oyedepo: How From Poverty He Became the Richest Pastor on the Earth – You Too Can(Akure, Nigeria; Kingdom Books & Media, 2015)

    [9]For more on Benson Idahosa see Matthews A. Ojo, ‘Nigerian Pentecostalism and Transnational Religious Networks in West African Coastal Region’ in Entreprises Religieuses Transationales En Afrique d l’Ouestedited by Laurent Fourchard, André Mary, and Rene Otayek, (Paris: Editions Karthala & Ibadan: IFRA, 2005), pp. 395-415. 

    [10]Benson Idahosa, I Choose to Change: The Scriptural Way to Success and Prosperity(Crowborough, UK: Highland Books, 1987), pp. 9 & 14.

    [11]For critique of the Protestant Ethic and the Prosperity Gospel, please see Paul Gifford and Trad Nogueira-Godsey, ‘The Protestant Ethic and African Pentecostalism: A Case Study’,Journal for the Study of Religion, Vol. 24, No. 1 (2011), pp. 5-22